Skip to main content

The Tale of Society Management: A Risky Gamble and the Power of Legal Wisdom



Imagine you're suddenly thrust into the heart of an institution, a society committee. It’s supposed to be about maintaining the community—simple tasks, easy decisions. But the complexity of governance lurks beneath the surface, and if you ignore it, it could collapse in an instant.


Case Study: Garden View Society, Vashi. Rajneesh Vasant Sawant, a resident of 33 years, was once part of such a system. But over time, the board of this housing society turned into something darker than a mere management team. They didn’t just collect maintenance fees or fix the occasional plumbing issue. No, they played with fire.


They made decisions without the legal framework. They thought they were invincible—operating outside the law’s reach, certain that no one would challenge them. Then came the inevitable crash. The law caught up.


A simple check: Did the committee follow the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act?

No. Were they elected in a legally sound manner? No. Did they think their unchecked power would last forever? Absolutely.


But Rajneesh wasn’t about to accept this fate. After years of harassment, exclusion from meetings, and public humiliation, he took the ultimate step. He started digging into the society’s records. What did he uncover? Misuse of funds, fake documents, and a committee operating illegally from the very start.


At this moment, Rajneesh had two options: Walk away, or fight back. The choice was clear. He took his findings to the police, and when they didn’t act, he turned to the legal system. He filed for a criminal investigation under CRPC 156(3). The court responded, and the law did what it’s meant to do—deliver justice.


A few months later, the committee members, now facing over 15 legal charges for their mismanagement, were left to reckon with their decisions. Had they simply followed legal counsel from the start, it would have been a different story. Instead, they tried to bypass the system, believing they could escape without consequence. But in the world of law, consequences always catch up.


The takeaway from this? Legal advice isn’t just an added cost. It’s a safeguard. The committee’s failure to take proper legal counsel was the exact reason they found themselves in deep legal trouble. It’s like driving a car without brakes: the outcome is almost inevitable.


In the world of society management, avoiding legal guidance is not just risky—it’s reckless. And as Rajneesh's case proves, the law always catches up, and when it does, it’s unforgiving.


If you manage a housing society, get legal advice. Don’t wait for things to unravel. Because, in the end, the law is never on your side unless you respect it.


Chinmay Jawale

Advocate, Bombay High Court

8454934770

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

10 Landmark Judgments That Have Shaped the POCSO Act

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) is an Indian legislation that defines and penalizes sexual offenses against children. It also provides for the establishment of special courts and child-friendly procedures for the trial of such cases. The POCSO Act was enacted in response to the growing number of cases of child sexual abuse in India and is considered to be a landmark piece of legislation in the fight against child sexual abuse. Here are some of the top 10 landmark judgments in POCSO Act with citation: 1. Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana (2013) - The Supreme Court held that the POCSO Act is a special law and takes precedence over the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in cases of sexual offences against children. [Citation: Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana, (2013) 10 SCC 419] 2. State of Karnataka v. Shivanna  (2014) - The Supreme Court held that the POCSO Act does not require recording every statement made under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Proced...

पोलीस अधिकारी/कर्मचाऱ्यांविरुद्ध तक्रार कशी दाखल करावी

  एक पोलीस अधिकारी पोलीस दलात सामील होत असताना तो/ती शपथ घेतो/घेते की तो/ती नेहमीच देशातील लोकांचे रक्षण करेल आणि हे त्याचे/तिचे पहिले कर्तव्य असेल. पण काही वेळा पोलीस अधिकारी त्यांना प्रदान केलेल्या कर्तव्याचा व अधिकारांचा चुकीच्या पद्धतीने वापर करतात. यासाठी सुप्रीम कोर्टाने PCA- पोलिस तक्रार प्राधिकरण स्थापन केले आहे. हे प्राधिकरण पोलिस अधिकार्‍यांविरुद्धच्या लोकांच्या तक्रारी पाहते. हे प्राधिकरण मुळात निवृत्त न्यायाधीशांच्या अध्यक्षतेखालील एक पॅनेल आहे जे पोलिसांविरुद्धच्या गैरवर्तन किंवा निष्क्रियतेची प्रत्येक तक्रारींवरील सुनावणी करते. महाराष्ट्राने २०१४ मध्ये पोलिस तक्रार प्राधिकरण (PCAs) ची स्थापना साली. पोलिस कर्मचार्‍यांविरुद्ध जनतेच्या तक्रारींची चौकशी करण्यासाठी ही एक स्वतंत्र संस्था स्थापण्यात अली आहेत. PCA मध्ये गंभीर गैरवर्तन, भ्रष्टाचार आणि अधिकाराचा गैरवापर अशा आरोपांच्या प्रकरणांशी कारवाई केली जाते. महाराष्ट्रात, राज्यस्तरावर एक PCA आणि नाशिक, पुणे, औरंगाबाद, नागपूर, अमरावती आणि कोकणात विभागीय स्तरावर सहा PCA आहेत. भारतातील प्रत्येक राज्यात एकापेक्षा जास्त PCA अ...

Bombay High Court uplifts developer selection in a prolonged housing society redevelopment dispute

     In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court has upheld the choice of Shubham Builders as the developer under the redevelopment project of Kanchan Villa Co-operative Housing Society in Malad (West), Mumbai. A division bench headed by Justices B.P. Colabawalla and Somasekhar Sundaresan has pronounced the judgment on the challenge to a notice of motion wherein the court would determine if the selection process followed by the developer had, at all, kept with the letter and spirit of the law, after which it would have ramifications on redevelopments by cooperative housing societies. Background      The case lies in the trench of controversy that has been on for long over the selection of Shubham Builders for the redevelopment of the Kanchan Villa Co-operative Housing Society, which was wallowing in litigation for a little more than a decade. Appellants, being members of the society, had, in the meantime, questioned the selection of the developer in the h...