Skip to main content

Understanding the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Zaro FIR Procedures




In a significant overhaul of India's criminal justice system, the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)-2023 has replaced the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) of 1973. Among the many updates, one notable change is the registration of a cognizable offence, now provided under Section 173 of BNSS instead of Section 154 of CrPC. This new framework introduces a streamlined process for handling Zero FIRs, ensuring that justice is more accessible and efficient. Here’s an outline of the procedural steps for submitting and processing Zero FIRs under the BNSS.

1. Lodging a Zero FIR under BNSS

Step 1: Complaint Submission
A complainant can approach any police station, regardless of territorial jurisdiction, to file a complaint about a cognizable offence (Section 173(1) BNSS).

Step 2: Recording the Complaint
Upon receiving information about a cognizable offence outside the station's jurisdiction, the Station House Officer (SHO) or the duty officer records the complaint in the Zero FIR register. This is known as registering a Zero FIR or ‘O’ FIR under relevant sections of law.

Section 173(1) BNSS Provisions:
- Information regarding a cognizable offence can be given orally or by electronic communication.
- If given orally, it must be written down and read back to the informant for verification and signature.
- If given electronically, it must be signed by the informant within three days and entered into the official records.

Special Provisions:
- For offences against women (sections 64-71, 74-79, 124 BNSS), a female officer must record the information.
- For offences against persons with disabilities, information should be recorded at the victim's residence or a convenient location, in the presence of an interpreter or special educator, and the process should be videographed. The statement must then be recorded by a Judicial Magistrate promptly.

2. Preliminary Enquiry

Section 173(3) BNSS Provisions:
Upon receiving information about a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment between three to seven years, the officer-in-charge, with prior permission from a Deputy Superintendent of Police, may:
- Conduct a preliminary enquiry within 14 days to determine if there is a prima facie case.
- Proceed with the investigation if a prima facie case exists.

3. Registration and Copy to the Complainant

Step 3: Zero FIR Registration
Once the requirements under Section 173 BNSS are fulfilled, the officer registers the Zero FIR, prefixed with "Zero" to denote its nature. A copy of the FIR is provided to the informant or victim free of charge (Section 173(2) BNSS). If necessary, initial investigations (e.g., medical examination of a rape victim) may be conducted by the same police station.

4. Transfer of Zero FIR

Step 4: Forwarding the Zero FIR
The officer forwards the Zero FIR to the police station with jurisdiction over the location of the incident.

Step 5: Receiving and Reregistering
The concerned police station receives the Zero FIR and reregisters it as a regular FIR in their records.

Step 6: Assignment for Investigation
The SHO assigns the FIR to an investigating officer for further action.

5. Investigation

Step 7: Proceeding with Investigation
The investigating officer proceeds with the investigation according to standard procedures under BNSS.

Step 8: Regular Updates
The complainant is provided with regular updates on the progress of the investigation.

Conclusion

The BNSS-2023 introduces a more structured and inclusive approach to handling cognizable offences, especially through the use of Zero FIRs. By allowing complaints to be filed at any police station regardless of jurisdiction and ensuring special provisions for vulnerable groups, the BNSS aims to make the justice system more accessible and responsive to the needs of all citizens. This procedural shift marks a significant step towards a more streamlined and effective criminal justice system in India.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

10 Landmark Judgments That Have Shaped the POCSO Act

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) is an Indian legislation that defines and penalizes sexual offenses against children. It also provides for the establishment of special courts and child-friendly procedures for the trial of such cases. The POCSO Act was enacted in response to the growing number of cases of child sexual abuse in India and is considered to be a landmark piece of legislation in the fight against child sexual abuse. Here are some of the top 10 landmark judgments in POCSO Act with citation: 1. Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana (2013) - The Supreme Court held that the POCSO Act is a special law and takes precedence over the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in cases of sexual offences against children. [Citation: Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana, (2013) 10 SCC 419] 2. State of Karnataka v. Shivanna  (2014) - The Supreme Court held that the POCSO Act does not require recording every statement made under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Proced...

पोलीस अधिकारी/कर्मचाऱ्यांविरुद्ध तक्रार कशी दाखल करावी

  एक पोलीस अधिकारी पोलीस दलात सामील होत असताना तो/ती शपथ घेतो/घेते की तो/ती नेहमीच देशातील लोकांचे रक्षण करेल आणि हे त्याचे/तिचे पहिले कर्तव्य असेल. पण काही वेळा पोलीस अधिकारी त्यांना प्रदान केलेल्या कर्तव्याचा व अधिकारांचा चुकीच्या पद्धतीने वापर करतात. यासाठी सुप्रीम कोर्टाने PCA- पोलिस तक्रार प्राधिकरण स्थापन केले आहे. हे प्राधिकरण पोलिस अधिकार्‍यांविरुद्धच्या लोकांच्या तक्रारी पाहते. हे प्राधिकरण मुळात निवृत्त न्यायाधीशांच्या अध्यक्षतेखालील एक पॅनेल आहे जे पोलिसांविरुद्धच्या गैरवर्तन किंवा निष्क्रियतेची प्रत्येक तक्रारींवरील सुनावणी करते. महाराष्ट्राने २०१४ मध्ये पोलिस तक्रार प्राधिकरण (PCAs) ची स्थापना साली. पोलिस कर्मचार्‍यांविरुद्ध जनतेच्या तक्रारींची चौकशी करण्यासाठी ही एक स्वतंत्र संस्था स्थापण्यात अली आहेत. PCA मध्ये गंभीर गैरवर्तन, भ्रष्टाचार आणि अधिकाराचा गैरवापर अशा आरोपांच्या प्रकरणांशी कारवाई केली जाते. महाराष्ट्रात, राज्यस्तरावर एक PCA आणि नाशिक, पुणे, औरंगाबाद, नागपूर, अमरावती आणि कोकणात विभागीय स्तरावर सहा PCA आहेत. भारतातील प्रत्येक राज्यात एकापेक्षा जास्त PCA अ...

Bombay High Court uplifts developer selection in a prolonged housing society redevelopment dispute

     In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court has upheld the choice of Shubham Builders as the developer under the redevelopment project of Kanchan Villa Co-operative Housing Society in Malad (West), Mumbai. A division bench headed by Justices B.P. Colabawalla and Somasekhar Sundaresan has pronounced the judgment on the challenge to a notice of motion wherein the court would determine if the selection process followed by the developer had, at all, kept with the letter and spirit of the law, after which it would have ramifications on redevelopments by cooperative housing societies. Background      The case lies in the trench of controversy that has been on for long over the selection of Shubham Builders for the redevelopment of the Kanchan Villa Co-operative Housing Society, which was wallowing in litigation for a little more than a decade. Appellants, being members of the society, had, in the meantime, questioned the selection of the developer in the h...