Skip to main content

Understanding the Process of Filing a Sexual Harassment Complaint in the Workplace



Introduction: 
Sexual harassment is a serious issue that can affect individuals in various settings, including the workplace. In this blog post, we'll break down the process of filing a sexual harassment complaint in the workplace in India. We'll discuss key terms, the legal framework, and the steps involved in making a complaint. 

Key Terms: 

Before delving into the process, let's understand two important terms: 

1. Aggrieved Woman: An "aggrieved woman" refers to someone who has experienced uncomfortable or hurtful behavior, specifically sexual harassment. This term encompasses women who have faced sexual harassment at their workplace or in a dwelling place where they work. 

2. Sexual Harassment: Sexual harassment involves inappropriate behavior that makes a person, usually a woman in this context, feel uncomfortable or unsafe. It can take various forms, including physical contact, demands for sexual favors, sexually colored remarks, showing pornography, and unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature. 

Filing a Sexual Harassment Complaint: Now that we have a clear understanding of the key terms, let's explore the process of filing a sexual harassment complaint in the workplace: 

1. Writing a Complaint: - A person who believes they have been sexually harassed must submit a written complaint. This can be done by the aggrieved woman herself, or in some cases, someone else can assist her in putting it in writing if she cannot do so herself. 

2. Time Limit: - The complaint should be filed within three months from the date of the incident. If there are multiple incidents, the three-month window applies from the date of the last incident. - The internal committee or local committee, responsible for addressing such complaints, can extend this time limit by up to three more months, provided they document their reasons for doing so. 

3. Alternate Complaint Filing: - In situations where the aggrieved woman cannot file a complaint herself due to physical, mental, or other reasons, a close relative, friend, co-worker, or authorized personnel can file a complaint on her behalf, with her written consent. 

4. The Role of the Complaints Committee: - The complaints committee is responsible for receiving and addressing sexual harassment complaints. Once the complaint is filed, it is forwarded to the person being complained against (the respondent) within seven working days. 

5. Respondent's Response: - The respondent has ten working days to respond to the complaint. They can provide documents, a list of documents, and the names and addresses of witnesses to support their side of the story. 

6. Principles of Natural Justice: - The complaints committee conducts an inquiry while adhering to the principles of natural justice to ensure a fair and unbiased process. 

7. No Legal Representation: - During the inquiry, neither party, i.e., the aggrieved woman nor the respondent, is allowed to have a lawyer represent them. 

8. Committee Requirements: - A minimum of three members of the complaints committee, including the presiding officer or chairperson, must be present during the inquiry. 

9. Consequences of Non-Participation: - If either party, without valid reasons, does not attend three consecutive hearings, the committee may halt the inquiry or make a decision without their participation, provided they give a 15-day notice. 

Conclusion: 

Filing a sexual harassment complaint in the workplace involves a structured process designed to ensure fairness, transparency, and a balanced approach for all parties involved. It's crucial for individuals to be aware of their rights and the steps to take if they experience sexual harassment at work. By understanding the process, victims can seek justice and create safer working environments for all.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

10 Landmark Judgments That Have Shaped the POCSO Act

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) is an Indian legislation that defines and penalizes sexual offenses against children. It also provides for the establishment of special courts and child-friendly procedures for the trial of such cases. The POCSO Act was enacted in response to the growing number of cases of child sexual abuse in India and is considered to be a landmark piece of legislation in the fight against child sexual abuse. Here are some of the top 10 landmark judgments in POCSO Act with citation: 1. Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana (2013) - The Supreme Court held that the POCSO Act is a special law and takes precedence over the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in cases of sexual offences against children. [Citation: Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana, (2013) 10 SCC 419] 2. State of Karnataka v. Shivanna  (2014) - The Supreme Court held that the POCSO Act does not require recording every statement made under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Proced...

पोलीस अधिकारी/कर्मचाऱ्यांविरुद्ध तक्रार कशी दाखल करावी

  एक पोलीस अधिकारी पोलीस दलात सामील होत असताना तो/ती शपथ घेतो/घेते की तो/ती नेहमीच देशातील लोकांचे रक्षण करेल आणि हे त्याचे/तिचे पहिले कर्तव्य असेल. पण काही वेळा पोलीस अधिकारी त्यांना प्रदान केलेल्या कर्तव्याचा व अधिकारांचा चुकीच्या पद्धतीने वापर करतात. यासाठी सुप्रीम कोर्टाने PCA- पोलिस तक्रार प्राधिकरण स्थापन केले आहे. हे प्राधिकरण पोलिस अधिकार्‍यांविरुद्धच्या लोकांच्या तक्रारी पाहते. हे प्राधिकरण मुळात निवृत्त न्यायाधीशांच्या अध्यक्षतेखालील एक पॅनेल आहे जे पोलिसांविरुद्धच्या गैरवर्तन किंवा निष्क्रियतेची प्रत्येक तक्रारींवरील सुनावणी करते. महाराष्ट्राने २०१४ मध्ये पोलिस तक्रार प्राधिकरण (PCAs) ची स्थापना साली. पोलिस कर्मचार्‍यांविरुद्ध जनतेच्या तक्रारींची चौकशी करण्यासाठी ही एक स्वतंत्र संस्था स्थापण्यात अली आहेत. PCA मध्ये गंभीर गैरवर्तन, भ्रष्टाचार आणि अधिकाराचा गैरवापर अशा आरोपांच्या प्रकरणांशी कारवाई केली जाते. महाराष्ट्रात, राज्यस्तरावर एक PCA आणि नाशिक, पुणे, औरंगाबाद, नागपूर, अमरावती आणि कोकणात विभागीय स्तरावर सहा PCA आहेत. भारतातील प्रत्येक राज्यात एकापेक्षा जास्त PCA अ...

Bombay High Court uplifts developer selection in a prolonged housing society redevelopment dispute

     In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court has upheld the choice of Shubham Builders as the developer under the redevelopment project of Kanchan Villa Co-operative Housing Society in Malad (West), Mumbai. A division bench headed by Justices B.P. Colabawalla and Somasekhar Sundaresan has pronounced the judgment on the challenge to a notice of motion wherein the court would determine if the selection process followed by the developer had, at all, kept with the letter and spirit of the law, after which it would have ramifications on redevelopments by cooperative housing societies. Background      The case lies in the trench of controversy that has been on for long over the selection of Shubham Builders for the redevelopment of the Kanchan Villa Co-operative Housing Society, which was wallowing in litigation for a little more than a decade. Appellants, being members of the society, had, in the meantime, questioned the selection of the developer in the h...