Skip to main content

7 MUST KNOW THINGS ABOUT FIR

 


1. What is FIR?

First Information Report (FIR) is a written document prepared by the police when they receive information about the commission of a cognizable offence. (Cognizable Offence is one in which the police may arrest a person without warrant i.e. they do not require permission of the court to arrest anybody)

Eg. Rape, murder, dacoity etc.

It is generally a complaint lodged with the police by the victim of a cognizable offence or by someone on his/her behalf.

2. Why is FIR important?

An FIR is a very important document as it sets the process of criminal justice in motion. It is only after the FIR is registered in the police station that the police takes up investigation of the case.

3. Who can file/lodge the FIR?

You can file the FIR if:
1)You are the person against whom the offence has been committed; or
2)You know about an offence which has been committed; or
3)You have seen the offence being committed.

4. What is the procedure of filing an FIR?

The procedure of filing an FIR is prescribed in Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

1) When information about the commission of a cognizable offence is given orally, the police must write it down.
2)It is your right as a person giving information or making a complaint to demand that the information recorded by the police is read over to you.
3)Once the information has been recorded by the police, it must be signed by the person giving the information.
4)You should sign the report only after verifying that the information recorded by the police is as per the details given by you.
5)People who cannot read or write must put their left thumb impression on the document after being satisfied that it is a correct record.
6) Always ask for a copy of the FIR, if the police do not give it to you. It is your right to get it free of cost.

5. What should you mention in the FIR?

1) Your name and address;
2) Date, time and location of the incident you are reporting;
3) The true facts of the incident as they occurred;
4) Names and descriptions of the persons involved in the incident;
5) Witnesses, if any.

6. What can you do if your FIR is not registered?

1)You can meet the Superintendent of Police or other higher officers like Deputy Inspector General of Police & Inspector General of Police and bring your complaint to their notice.
2)You can send your complaint in writing and by post to the Superintendent of Police concerned. If the Superintendent of Police is satisfied with your complaint, he shall either investigate the case himself or order an investigation to be made.
3)You can file a private complaint before the court having jurisdiction.
4) You can also make a complaint to the State Human Rights Commission or the National Human Rights Commission if the police does nothing to enforce the law or does it in a biased and corrupt manner.

7. Things you should NOT do :

1) Never file a false complaint or give wrong information to the police. You can be prosecuted under law for giving wrong information or for misleading the police. (Section 203, Indian Penal Code 1860)
2) Never exaggerate or distort facts.
3) Never make vague or unclear statements.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

10 Landmark Judgments That Have Shaped the POCSO Act

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) is an Indian legislation that defines and penalizes sexual offenses against children. It also provides for the establishment of special courts and child-friendly procedures for the trial of such cases. The POCSO Act was enacted in response to the growing number of cases of child sexual abuse in India and is considered to be a landmark piece of legislation in the fight against child sexual abuse. Here are some of the top 10 landmark judgments in POCSO Act with citation: 1. Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana (2013) - The Supreme Court held that the POCSO Act is a special law and takes precedence over the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in cases of sexual offences against children. [Citation: Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana, (2013) 10 SCC 419] 2. State of Karnataka v. Shivanna  (2014) - The Supreme Court held that the POCSO Act does not require recording every statement made under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Proced...

पोलीस अधिकारी/कर्मचाऱ्यांविरुद्ध तक्रार कशी दाखल करावी

  एक पोलीस अधिकारी पोलीस दलात सामील होत असताना तो/ती शपथ घेतो/घेते की तो/ती नेहमीच देशातील लोकांचे रक्षण करेल आणि हे त्याचे/तिचे पहिले कर्तव्य असेल. पण काही वेळा पोलीस अधिकारी त्यांना प्रदान केलेल्या कर्तव्याचा व अधिकारांचा चुकीच्या पद्धतीने वापर करतात. यासाठी सुप्रीम कोर्टाने PCA- पोलिस तक्रार प्राधिकरण स्थापन केले आहे. हे प्राधिकरण पोलिस अधिकार्‍यांविरुद्धच्या लोकांच्या तक्रारी पाहते. हे प्राधिकरण मुळात निवृत्त न्यायाधीशांच्या अध्यक्षतेखालील एक पॅनेल आहे जे पोलिसांविरुद्धच्या गैरवर्तन किंवा निष्क्रियतेची प्रत्येक तक्रारींवरील सुनावणी करते. महाराष्ट्राने २०१४ मध्ये पोलिस तक्रार प्राधिकरण (PCAs) ची स्थापना साली. पोलिस कर्मचार्‍यांविरुद्ध जनतेच्या तक्रारींची चौकशी करण्यासाठी ही एक स्वतंत्र संस्था स्थापण्यात अली आहेत. PCA मध्ये गंभीर गैरवर्तन, भ्रष्टाचार आणि अधिकाराचा गैरवापर अशा आरोपांच्या प्रकरणांशी कारवाई केली जाते. महाराष्ट्रात, राज्यस्तरावर एक PCA आणि नाशिक, पुणे, औरंगाबाद, नागपूर, अमरावती आणि कोकणात विभागीय स्तरावर सहा PCA आहेत. भारतातील प्रत्येक राज्यात एकापेक्षा जास्त PCA अ...

Bombay High Court uplifts developer selection in a prolonged housing society redevelopment dispute

     In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court has upheld the choice of Shubham Builders as the developer under the redevelopment project of Kanchan Villa Co-operative Housing Society in Malad (West), Mumbai. A division bench headed by Justices B.P. Colabawalla and Somasekhar Sundaresan has pronounced the judgment on the challenge to a notice of motion wherein the court would determine if the selection process followed by the developer had, at all, kept with the letter and spirit of the law, after which it would have ramifications on redevelopments by cooperative housing societies. Background      The case lies in the trench of controversy that has been on for long over the selection of Shubham Builders for the redevelopment of the Kanchan Villa Co-operative Housing Society, which was wallowing in litigation for a little more than a decade. Appellants, being members of the society, had, in the meantime, questioned the selection of the developer in the h...